Breaking News on Food and Beverage Processing and PackagingWorldUSEurope

News > Financial

Guest article

Corporate v decentralized procurement

Post a commentBy Jimmy Anklesaria , 30-Jul-2014
Last updated on 30-Jul-2014 at 11:44 GMT

The food and beverage industry today is faced with the question of whether corporate procurement is more effective than decentralized procurement. While its challenges set it apart from other industries, F&B organizations share common procurement practices with those in other industry sectors. 

‘Many ingredients in the F&B industry are universal and market-driven commodities, making a good argument for corporate procurement. For example, a major food company that uses tomatoes across most of its divisions or subsidiaries would reap many benefits from a global contract for tomatoes, including the ability to leverage volume and have a single point of contact to manage all suppliers.

Consider the cost of what is thrown away

There are distinctions, however, that influence procurement processes. When a well-known and respected brand is involved, it makes more sense for the concerned business unit to make decisions with the assistance of corporate procurement. It’s very difficult for corporate procurement to take over and manage the supply chain of an individual brand. Instead, corporate procurement should be realistic and help the division make decisions by sharing its research and data.   

The same holds true when waste and timing are important considerations. While a corporate contract for a product may be good from a purchase price point of view, it may not be from a spoilage point of view. Consider the cost of what is thrown away. Here again, the division should be the decision maker because it can focus on keeping the supply chain as short as possible.

Pasta sauce division of a major food company

Earlier this year, after suffering considerable market share decline, the pasta sauce division of a major food company agreed to involve its corporate procurement department and key suppliers in a collaborative process. Harnessing the inherent abilities of all members of the supply chain, the group developed an idea that not only increased market share, it saved money and retained the brand image. No suppliers were changed, nor did the division give up any control over the decision making. Corporate procurement brought value in helping the division push the brand further, not take the brand from it.

While there is much for F&B organizations to consider, know that there is no cookie cutter answer, nor will your answer always be black and white. In my experience, the best mix is one of center-led, decentralized procurement, where everyone is focused on the business, and where corporate understands the needs of the divisions and brings value to their decision making process.’

Author and lecturer, Jimmy Anklesaria, is the founder of Anklesaria Group, who has influenced the procurement transformation process at numerous Fortune 500 companies. He currently teaches a graduate course in Supply Chain Management at the University of California, San Diego.

Subscribe to our FREE newsletter

Get FREE access to authoritative breaking news, videos, podcasts, webinars and white papers. SUBSCRIBE

Post a comment

Comment title *
Your comment *
Your name *
Your email *

We will not publish your email on the site

I agree to Terms and Conditions

These comments have not been moderated. You are encouraged to participate with comments that are relevant to our news stories. You should not post comments that are abusive, threatening, defamatory, misleading or invasive of privacy. For the full terms and conditions for commenting see clause 7 of our Terms and Conditions ‘Participating in Online Communities’. These terms may be updated from time to time, so please read them before posting a comment. Any comment that violates these terms may be removed in its entirety as we do not edit comments. If you wish to complain about a comment please use the "REPORT ABUSE" button or contact the editors.