US horse meat tainted with the illegal chemical phenylbutazone (bute) is putting consumers worldwide at risk of illness, according an equine welfare organisation located in the country.
European Union (EU) regulation No.504/2008 requires that all horses in Europe hold a ‘passport’ to allow traceability of veterinary records in particular.
The European Commission (EC) said that horses designated as ‘athletes’, and not intended for human consumption, should hold records of use of bute as an potent analgesic, to guarantee the absence of contaminated meat from the food chain.
In particular, EU regulations on drug residues in horse meat intended for human consumption define the risk to children in particular of eating horse meat containing banned substances such as bute.
Aplastic anemia in children
A recent Irish research paper in the Irish Veterinary Journal (Vol. 63 No.10) warned: “The difficulty with phenylbutazone is that it, or its metabolite, can cause aplastic anemia in children.
“If a child were to consumer an animal-based product containing even the minutest amount of bute or its metabolite then the child may develop aplastic anemia.”
If an EU audit of a country such as Ireland discovered evidence of bute use on animals not excluded from the food chain, the product would immediately lose it EU-wide license, the researchers warned.
“One child’s bone marrow illness could be traced to a meat product that could be traced to an owner and a vet who prescribed bute,” they added.
By 2013, all third country importers will have to comply with EU traceability standards under the regulation.
And although US horses are not reared and regulated for food use, the Equine Welfare Alliance (EWA) based in that country warned that the US has no mechanism for removing animals from the food chain that have received banned substances.
The Humane Society for the United States estimates that around 100,000 horses are exported from the US for slaughter every year, with the bulk of meat produced sent to satisfy “high-end consumers” in countries such as Belgium and Japan.
And the EWA said that the US had no way to trace horses back to owners or veterinarians that allowed the animals in question to enter the food chain.
Shipped for slaughter
Both Canada and Mexico were instituting tracking programmes based on radio frequency identification (RFID) tagging technology to comply with the EU regulation, but the EWA noted that the US had scrapped its own National Animal Identification System (NAIS) in 2010.
EWA spokeswoman John Holland told FoodProductionDaily.com: “Horses have always been shipped to Mexico and Canada for slaughter. The closing of plants [that killed horses at plants in Texas and Illinois for export abroad until 2007] didn’t save US horses from slaughter as the industry began shipping all horses across the borders.”
The EWA is calling for US congress to pass the American Horse Slaughter Prevention Act 2011 to provide further regulatory protection for US horses and consumers worldwide.
This seeks to amend current legislation, and prohibit the shipping, transportation, moving, devliery, receipt, possession, purchase, selling or donation of horses or other equines to be slaughtered for human consumption.
Vicki Tobin, also from the EWA, said that the act should be passed: “Congress must start taking food safety seriously and realise the risk to the US for knowingly allowing unsafe food into foreign markets.
“These animals should never enter the food chain.”
In a 2010 paper for the Journal of Food and Chemical Toxicology, Marini et al. tracked 18 race horses to slaughter that had been dosed with bute, which the researchers described as, “arguably the most potent and effective pain-relieving agent available in equine medicine”.
Their study found that the phenylbutazone was taken up in injured tissues, and was later released back into the animals’ blood streams as tissues healed, while there was no acceptable drug washout period.






17 comments (Comments are now closed)
3 days from stable to table your eu meatman proudly claimed
USA shipped to slaughter all race horses full of drugs. Thousands of pet horses full of drugs were stolen and shipped to slaughter. Even the BLM in charge of wild horses states many horses are just ranch strays or abandoned horses.
The American horsemeat people should be stopped sending companion animals they know are not fit for humans to eat.
How many people have died because of a few greedy americans?
Report abuse
Posted by Laura Meritt
05 October 2011 | 17h56
HSUS No Authority on Horse Meat
Fred, you need to read further into the scientific papers and articles relating to metabolism and elimination of bute in horses. While it is true Pb can generally only be detected in serum/plasma and urine for a period of 72 hours, it is not true that Pb is eliminated from the horse's system within that time frame. It can take up to 2 months (60 days) to completely eliminate it from the system...and that system includes muscle/meat tissue, which is what humans consume.
Given the fact that many racehorses are summarily dumped after poor race performance, what do you think the chances are that none of these horses headed for slaughter, do not have bute in their systems?
And I think you are terribly naive if you believe show horses are not pumped full of drugs. I have firsthand knowledge of equine drug testing of those pretty show horses and I can tell you for a fact, outside FEI competitors who are subject to ZERO tolerance, these animals are drugged routinely at or above therapeutic levels with bute and a whole host of other nasty drugs considered unsafe for human consumption. The leading horse breed and various discipline organizations, along with the domestic and international governing bodies ALL have drugs and medications guidelines...why do you think that is? Because the organizations KNOW the horses are going to be drugged. To think otherwise is sheer folly.
Report abuse
Posted by JRS
01 October 2011 | 21h34
ALL North American horsemeat unsafe
EU and other consumers of North American originated horsemeat need to know that none of the horsemeat originating from the US, Canada, and Mexico is safe for human consumption. Simply put, so long as US horses are entering the food chain via slaughter plants in Mexico and Canada, it is IMPOSSIBLE to determine if the meat was derived from a US horse that had at any point in its life been treated with banned substances - particularly bute.
Here is a link to EU food safety regs with regard to horsemeat. Pay particular attention to section 5.3.1. 1 - paragraph 3.
http://ec.europa.eu/food/food/chemicalsafety/residues/third_countries_en.htm
I am very surprised that food safety watchdog groups and consumers in the EU have allowed the EU food safety commission to violate its own laws in such an obvious and tremendously dangerous manner.
Report abuse
Posted by Gail Vacca
30 September 2011 | 13h50
What does HSUS have to do with food safety laws?
Fred, what does HSUS have to do with food safety? The EU and FDA are the authority on what medications are allowable in animals that are consumed by humans. The information provided is from both agencies, not HSUS. The medical professionals set the rules and according to their rules, US horses should not be entering the food chain.
I’m not sure what purpose your post served other than to let everyone know that you don’t like HSUS. That doesn’t impact food safety laws nor will it make horse owners suddenly embrace horse slaughter.
Report abuse
Posted by vicki tobin
30 September 2011 | 05h39
Call on Congress now to pass the American Horse Slaughter Prevention Act
I second Laura Allen’s comment, and further, D.Verret has the larger concern nailed: state/fed agencies look the other way. There is a proven, and overall, lack of confidence that any US governmental entity can adequately function for the greater good. Aside from the abject failure of direction from the top, these overworked, under-supported public servants are ineffective in either preventing or stopping something that can cause great public harm. When will people learn?
Maybe there’s some twisted justice here: if someone consumes US horsemeat, they get what they deserve. And I pray it’s debilitating and painful. Support US S1176/HR2966.
Report abuse
Posted by KWebers
30 September 2011 | 04h49
Reality of US Export HCHS
While I agree, to some degree about the problems with the current HCHS situation in the US, I am not moved by hysterics.
The simple facts are that:
(1) US horsemeat for human consumption has never, and never will be properly regulated or inspected for human consumption based on or by FDA/USDA and EU standards or past history; and,
(2) US Equines are slaughtered at a rate profitable for the foreign owned HCHS plants still today, whether US based or internationally; and,
(3) Every US Equine slaughtered for export jeopardizes legitimate US meat producers faced with extensive documentation, regulation, inspection, etc that the equine KB bottom feeders never face and continue to peddle as US meat.
Sorry, guys (equine KBs)...you are not playing fair. But then again, I'm still trying to figure out why a roll of ground beef says country of origin..."US/CAN/MEX/NZ/AUS"? Would that be NAFTA, SAFTA, UPUTA????? How can one 5 pound roll of ground beef be allowed to have 5 countries of origin?
I buy US religiously, especially meat...for a reason.
Report abuse
Posted by D.Verret
30 September 2011 | 03h55
Thank God!!!
It's about time someone has finally stepped up to the plate and publicly said what the public has been screaming about for years. Greed is the factor behind the American Horse Slaughter. They could care less what happens to the horse as long as they get their money. They could care less who eats the meat or if someones child is ill and dying.They could care less about the forged papers for the horse,just getting the money and if they feel the need to fabricate the papers so they can get paid,then so be it. The whole world needs to force our government to put a stop to this now.!!!!
Report abuse
Posted by Nancy Thompson
30 September 2011 | 03h27
Finally!
I have been wondering when someone in the legit meat producing business would SAY SOMETHING about their own reputations being besmirched by the many of them who support horse slaughter - and RABIDLY to boot.
What ARE they thinking? Surely not that tired old "slippery slope" junk! Ending the slaughter of horses - a non-food animal - has nothing whatsoever to do with traditional animal-ag. They're not the same thing at all. And the cattlemen know it. At least I HOPE they don't really think it's okay to eat the flesh of an animal that has been buted! That is the way it appears though.
Come on, people. Don't ruin your own reputation by backing something as heinous as slaughtering horses for human consumption. Let 'em eat beef!
Report abuse
Posted by Suzanne Moore
30 September 2011 | 02h27
Time for Legit US Meat Producers to Protect Their Reps
Rosette:
I agree with you points. However the more serious implication is that state and Fed Ag agencies look the other way on equine exports (unless of course, you fly in for an international competition for equine athletes and have to have paperwork out the yo-yo and then there is still quarantine....but want to export for meat....all rules crumble and are ignored. Think cattle, swine, porcine, poultry and ovine exporters (live, on the hoof) can claim that? I don't think so.
The inhumane processing issues are one thing; but the undocumented, unregulated, uninspected meat (and when they did it here, they still didn't have US standards) are entirely a different matter.
I don't care that the KB in MI knows they are racers and have been exposed (most likely to) bute; I care that our government and some segments of the meat Ag industry think it is OK.
Report abuse
Posted by D.Verret
30 September 2011 | 01h03
HCHS Jeopardizes Legitimate US Meat Producers
JS:
Sorry...I am not one of those pretty ponies, equines are pets, butterflies and rainbows kind of person....I lived on farms and now a ranch. I don't think equines are people, but I also don't believe, as it is now they are MEAT.
No, the USDA still has import and export requirements...just not killfloor for equines in the US (where do you people come up with this nonsense?)...they are supposed to be at the import/export lots/checkpoints (unless, of course they have a LOI/MOU with state or other Fed agencies).
The GAO report also said, either do it right or ban it.
And in conclusion (see the humanewatch, FB, UH/UOH have been following Horseback), it is not a regulated or raised for human food source. It doesn't become a personal choice when you are lied to as a consumer that it is safe, when it isn't.
But US Equines are being safely processed in Can/Mex just as they were when the 3 foreign owned, foreign consumer, little to no tax paying, polluting violater plants were open in the US. Dr Lenz says the Mex plants for the EU are safe and sound practices. Can/Mex are slaughtering US Equines at about the same rate, based on demand, not ALL available stolen, sick, old, unwanted, abandoned US Equines per USDA AMS auction stats.
I study Ag and respect it's importance, shortcomings and future. I wish you would take the time to do the same.
Report abuse
Posted by D.Verret
30 September 2011 | 00h42
Anthropormorphism
People need to quit anthropomorphizing the horse processing issue. Horses are livestock, bred to be multi purpose animals, one of which the purpose is for food. Horses are not "crammed" into horrible trailers. Why? We have strict transport laws for horses being shipped to processing houses. Horses are required by law to be given rest and food and water at set intervals. They are again fed and watered upon arrival to holding facilities. Sick or injured horses are removed and euthanized and not processed.
It should be noted that the same laws that put a halt to the USDA inspection of horse meat ALSO put a halt to the USDA's inspection of horses being shipped. We call that "the unintended affect of the current ban". While people state they want to improve the welfare of horses via the proposed permanent ban on horse processing, they are ignoring the government report stating the direct result of the current ban has DECREASED horse welfare. That's right, the slaughter ban has created far worse conditions for horses AND blatantly ignores the fact horses are farm animals. And if you want to ban horses for moral issues, then there must be set resources in place to manage those unwanted, old, unusable, unsafe animals that would otherwise go to processing. Mustangs already cots the taxpayers 40million a year and growing to warehouse them. Is the public at large and rescues willing to take on the financial burden and care for those animals the processing market would have absorbed? 200,000 per year at a minimum cost of $500 a year per horse to house.
Electing not to eat horse meat or meat altogether is a personal choice, but should not be a governmental mandate. Saying that its unsafe or horrific to eat horse meant is no different than saying it's unsafe or horrific to eat cows, pigs, sheep, etc. The process is no different for them than horses nor is the regulatory standards. And if in
doubt, change, upgrade or create better processing or transporting regulatory laws. Pretty simple solution and much more realistic over simply canning an entire industry if the concern is simple safety.
Certainly, there is every reason to think that horses can continue to be safely processed and regulated in the US just like the rest of the livestock processing industry. And in these tough economic times, find it ironic that people and politicians are willing to kill a 60million dollar plus a year industry simply because they find the idea of eating horse meat distasteful.
Report abuse
Posted by JS
30 September 2011 | 00h25
HSUS Does Not Drive US Meat Production or Confidence
Fred....
HSUS is not the issue here; to claim that they are trying to end ALL agriculture is absurd.
The current situation with US Equines going to HCHS before, during and after the closure of the last 3 foreign owned slaughter plants, for foreign consumers closed is a matter of food safety and jeopardizing legitimate US Meat export reputation and yes, even US based consumers' confidence in our food system.
The small benefit to a few reckless, ignorant or beguiled equine owners does not warrant a support of the US HCHS bottom feeder sub-culture...I will not dignify the biz with the term "industry".
All equine owners ALWAYS have the right to euth via vet chem or qualified knacker (gunshot)...which frankly would keep money in the US for services and hopefully expand the serious need for reasonable rendering in this country.
I believe our country provides the best foods for us/US and the world, although I do believe improvements are needed in some areas.
The EU "passport" system will shutdown the bottom feeders, although they will still pencil whip paperwork and the USDA/FDA neither have the time, personnel or funds to check a foodsource for humans that we don't raise or regulate for humans.
If I was raising beef (and it is a difficult industry), I would be angry that org's like Farm Bureau and folks like you keep pushing HCHS, keep missing the safety points, etc.
Report abuse
Posted by D.Verret
30 September 2011 | 00h25
HSUS is No Authority on Horse Meat
The HSUS has an agenda to end agriculture - they have been working on demonizing the processing of horse meat for some time. Now, they are pushing it as unsafe unsafe and leading the public to believe that performance horses are being pumped full of drugs. Yes another HSUS fallacy.
Phenylbutazone is nothing more than "horse advil". It has a very short metabolized lifespan of 72hrs with in a horses system. In all the years of USDA testing horse meat there has never been 1 incident of a horse testing positive. So, the hype over unsafe meat that the US isn't even processing, seems silly.
There are two quotes people to need to see and read and understand. HSUS is not here to support animal welfare. They are here to remove animals from human use. There intent is Propaganda and Spin. And most people are not smart enough to see through the mist to their true agenda....
"My goal is the abolition of all animal agriculture." JP Goodwin, employed at the Humane Society of the US, formerly at Coalition to Abolish the Fur Trade, as quoted on AR-Views, an animal rights Internet discussion group in 1996.
"We have no ethical obligation to preserve the different breeds of livestock produced through selective breeding. . One generation and out. We have no problem with the extinction of domestic animals. They are creations of human selective breeding." Wayne Pacelle, Senior VP of Humane Society of the US, formerly of Friends of Animals and Fund for Animals, Animal People, May, 1993
Report abuse
Posted by Fred
30 September 2011 | 00h02
Unregulated US Horsemeat Threatens US MEAT Producers
For the few that rely on HCHS to dispose with little return, or the stolen equine or lied to final private owner...HCHS is an anathema to all respectable US meat producers.
It jeopardizes ALL US Meat Exports. Aren't we still trying to convince parts of Asia to buy our beef? I would have thought USDA, USMEF, NCBA, pork, lamb and poultry producers would have figured this out by now.
Ladies and gentlemen of the US meat producing business (and I think you are the best in the world), stop risking legitimate meat export reputation on those less than 3% of equine owners that WANT HCHS.
Report abuse
Posted by D. Verret
29 September 2011 | 20h41
Be the voice for the horses....
I completely agree with the two comments below! These horses should NEVER be on anyone's dinner table! The abuse that is done in the process of even getting them there is horendous! These horses at one point were someone's pet, a child's best friend, a confident, a worker etc - they should be treated with the utmost respect, care and dignity! If you don't believe us google horse slaughter and you can see on youtube what these horses go through. Truly the most inhumane way to die...aka be murdered.
They are stuffed in trucks, transported with no food or water....and they KNOW where they're headed.
I own a horse who came off a feed lot....(heading to slaughter). He is the most loving, sweetest of horses. He's terrified of certain areas because he remembers where he was. (So I don't take him to places like that).
He will be with me until he no longer walks this earth and will be buried very humanely when the time comes. He finally has the life he deserved so long ago. Breaks my heart to know where he once was. If I could save them all - I would! Just takes ONE person to make a difference. These wonderful creatures are our history! We need to preserve it! Not send them to their death and then end up on someone's dinner table.
I will tell you this - my horse had some major issues from where he came from ta boot....he's thankfully worked through them and trusts me now (saved my life from a bad situation) so I DO know these animals remember!
Report abuse
Posted by Olivia Ryan
29 September 2011 | 19h03
support a federal ban on horse slaughter
We all need to keep in touch with our state representatives on ths matter. a fedral ban would stop our horses from crossing borders into mexico and canada for slaughter! keep pushing, neer give up on our AMERICAN ICONS, who brought us where we are today.
Report abuse
Posted by mary papini
29 September 2011 | 18h37
Tainted horsemeat
Not only should these animals NEVER been in the food chain, the misery done to horses to provide Europe and Asia with horsemeat is a price too high for any animal to have to pay. the abuse is unbelievable and the bottom feeder humans called killer buyers are the ones who profit the most from the irresponsibility of owners who send thier horses to auction. Stop it for ever .
Report abuse
Posted by Patricia Bewley
29 September 2011 | 14h48
Read all comments (17)